PART 1
INTERPRETATION OF FILM THEME:
Lola and Professor Immanuel Rath (played by silent film
veteran Emil Jannings) represent the classic contradiction of the seductive
female and the hapless male. The vampish woman (Lola) is a force of powerful
sexuality, which is aligned with the deadly forces of nature (her animal print
costumes and the exoticness of The Blue Angel club) and individuality.
Professor Immanuel Rath is the lonely and sympathetic male aligned with
civilization (he is a respected teacher) who falls prey to her untamed
femininity. Although by today’s
standards the symbolism is inappropriate, the scene where Rath wakes up with a
black doll represents the dark and mysterious foreignness of Lola that is
alluring yet ultimately dangerous and unattainable. The key to the strange power manipulated by Lola is due to the
extraordinary sexuality that Sternberg gives to Dietrich. Lola’s performances
are a mixture of stylized seduction but are also highly camp. She embodies both
masculine and feminine traits in the way she dresses, moves and speaks. She may
sit on stage dressed in frilly underwear and gaze lovingly up at Rath, but also
wears a top hat and crosses her legs like man. She moves seamlessly from being
a passive object of desire to a sexually confident aggressor, and is sometimes
both simultaneously. The first time the audience see’s Lola is on the postcard
that Rath has confiscated from his students. Rath blows up a piece of cloth
pasted onto the card to conceal her crotch and the moment is one of pure male
objectification. However, this scene then cuts to Lola on stage where she is
shot from a low angel, making her appear to tower over the audience. Hands
defiantly on hips she sings through a sneer only pausing to take a beer off of
another woman. She is completely in control of her domain and her body. Her sexuality
is a weapon and she uses it against Rath to unsettle him. In a later scene when
Rath is under the table looking for the dropped cigarettes, the audience may
get a very unwholesome shot of Lola’s legs but Rath is the one looking
flustered and embarrassed while Lola teases him.
PART 2
INTERPRETATION OF CABARET SONGS:
"Chuck Out the Men" (Raus mit den Männern), by
Friedrich Hollaender (1926) Performed and recorded by Ute Lemper, Berlin
Cabaret Songs (Decca 1996).
English Lyric Translation:
The battle for emancipation's been raging since history
began
Yes, feminists of every nation want to chuck off the chains
made by man
Hula girls and housemaids and wives in Maribou
hear all our voices thunder in protest
Anything that men do women can do too
and more that that we women do it best
German Lyric Translation:
(für Claire Waldoff)
Es geht durch die ganze Historie
ein Ruf nach Emanzipation
vom Menschen bis zur Infusorie
überall will das Weib auf den Thron.
Vin Hawai-Neger bis zur Berliner Range
braust ein Ruf wie Donnerhall daher:
Was die Männer können, können wir schon lange
und vielleicht ’ne ganze Ecke mehr.
"Chuck Out the Men" is clearly a German feminist
national anthem; and conveys the way men in governmental positions and
positions in power were running not only the country but the world. The
original singer a lesbian herself (Claire Waldoff; October 21, 1884– January
22, 1957) wanted for all women to realize that they have the same ability to do
what the men can and that as women they are able to do a better job than any man
can. She believed that men were too focused on their reputation and did not recognize
the choices they make in governing the people had been detrimental to
humanity's growth and progress. I believe the lyrics relate to today's society
and how men in powerful political positions are given power over things that
affect specifically women and are too concerned with their own beliefs and
morals to care how their decisions that directly affect women. For example the
debates focused on abortions and birth control concern women's rights to
choose; but it’s being disputed over by men who barely understand the female
anatomy.
"It's All a Swindle" (Alles Schwindel), by Mischa
Spoliansky and Marcellus Schiffer (1931). Performed and recorded by Ute Lemper,
Berlin Cabaret Songs (Decca 1996).
English Lyric Translation:
Papa swindles
Mama swindles
Grandmama's a lying thief
We're perfectly shameless
but we're blameless
after all it's our belief
Nowadays the world is rotten
honesty has been forgotten
fall in love but after kissing --
check your purse to see what's missing
Everyone swindles some
my son's a mooch and so's the pooch
German Lyric Translation:
Alles Schwindel
Papa schwindelt,
Mama schwindelt,
tut sie auf blob ihren Mund!
Tante Otilie,
und die Familie
und sogar der kleine Hund!
Und besieht man’s aus der Nähe:
Jedes Band und jede Ehe
jeder Kub in dern Betriebe
und sogar die grobe Liebe!
Und die ganze heut’ge Zeit ja,
sogar die Ehrlichkeit!
LYRIC INTERPRETATION:
"It's All a Swindle” suggests everyone including family
such as parents, grandparents, children and even dog during these times were
deceitful and out to cheat and steal for personal gain regardless of it being
intentional or not. It was human nature to take whatever people wanted because
of how selfishness and greed were molding society during that time. Every one's shameless, but no one's to blame
means that it isn't the people's fault for behaving this way, but rather the
age of indulgences that caused social transformation stemming from mass
production of goods and the influence of mass media. People's values during this
time changed for the worst; and it was hard to trust anyone since everyone was
out to take others monies and possessions. It is a cynical song that even
emphasizes how the ones we love the most aren't worthy of trusting, and it even
mentions how we all have someone or something taking things from us or “mooching”
without even recognizing it , such as our children and or pets.
This verse makes us all of weary in today's society, especially to those we choose to surround ourselves with. It's a nice lesson in adapting to an ever changing social environment because we never know who to trust or put our faith into. Everything suggested in this song is true even today with the influence of mass media. Greed and selfishness harbor in people's minds today more prevalently because of the lack and abundance of money. Although, even if it's not money or possessions that people are looking for, it's always something people are getting from you; like the presence of good company, a laugh, or good times.
INTERPRETATION OF PARAGRAPH 175:
Paragraph 175 is a German law which condemned homosexuality
and made it punishable as a crime. It was added to the Reich Penal Code in
1871. It declared that a man who engaged in sexual activity with another man or
an animal will be punished by imprisonment, however If the party is under the
age of 21 punishment can be withheld. This law was later modified into two
sections 175a and 175b. The policy of what is an offense was changed and
lengthened using different regulations for grounds of punishment. The offense
was 10 years imprisonment or if one was under the age of 21 and engages in
sexual relations with a male younger then himself he is open punishment from
the law. However there are also other various circumstances that could condemn a
homosexual man.
This goes hand and hand with the lecture to the point in
where creating a law banning homosexuality and making it illegal; also goes
hand in hand to how society viewed and treated women and wanted to control their
social being and behavior(s) in Germany. In “Blue Angel” it illustrations us
the type of control social structure had; hence the professor partaking in a
relationship with Lola, which eventually causes his social statues to change.
It is interesting how a 21 year old at the time was considered a minor. I realized that a lot had changed from that time. Penal law is not working in Germany, and most part of Europe at this time I believe.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting how a 21 year old at the time was considered a minor. I realized that a lot had changed from that time. Penal law is not working in Germany, and most part of Europe at this time I believe.
ReplyDelete